I kind of agree with this women. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...asculine-virtues-negative-impact-society.html
I can kinda see where she's coming from, but over all, I think she's a fucking nutcase. http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303997604579240022857012920 PS Try to avoid The Daily Mail. It's a tabloid, not an actual news outlet.
everything that follows is MHO: I attribute this anti-man attitude partly to the single female parent households (and partly to the fact that fem-men are easier to control and cast into a mold). No man to be a role model so justify raising kids as women think. Chaos is bound to ensue. So, let kids sort it out for themselves and see what happens. I had no proper role model, I basically was on my own. Nobody, especially my biological father taught me anything about being a man or about the other softer way of thinking like a female. I was free to gravitate towards what behavior and attitudes were most appealing to me. Kids are subject to so much outside influence and outright brainwashing now, that there's no wonder so many are confused. Lanza was a confused kid, if you know what I mean. The 50 year experiment is a flop imho. http://www.eagleforum.org/educate/2006/apr06/social-engineering.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance Pink Floyd saw it: "hey teachers! leave them kids alone!" Like it or not, people are born with an XY or XX set of genes. XY brains operate differently than XX brains and, as far as we know, there is no in between. Let people be what they are instead of attempting to make them what they aren't. It doesn't matter if that be gay, hetero, fem or masculine. Let them sort it out for themselves without outside influence and accept the outcome. People have a tendency to try to force everyone to be like them and that's where problems stem.