Meh. I'm tired of bludgeoning the fact that the Militia Leader (one of the power-grabbers) saying whatever the heck he wants, to point out his safety in that remote lawless part of Libya, and that the "ordinary people" he is talking about are all people living in that lawless part of the world, armed to the teeth from years of fighting, hardened and radicalized. Let us just agree to disagree. And let us agree to disagree about what we agree that we disagree about, without being disagreeable in our disagreement over what we agree to disagree about agreeing on.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012...20120921?feedType=RSS&feedName=topNews&rpc=76 I just found the headline interesting.
Here we go, now this is what I'm talking about. Go-go Libya! http://www.cnn.com/2012/09/21/world/africa/libya-benghazi-counter-protest/index.html
Dont make them angry. They are fine if we do O-K-. My father harish said to throw the penny in temple and watch jews come and hindis leave. All people can be make angry. We live together or swim in vishnu.
Sounds like you're discribing a pitbull. Sweet as hell untill you make them angry. What does our society do to a pitbull once it has attacked and bitten a person?
I'd prefer that everyone in the world just chill out and learn to accept that not everyone has the same perspectives. But it seems the only thing people are willing to accept is that it isn't ever going to happen. Bummer!
That's sorta true, but there was a supercool one in between, the B-47 The nuquular plane Wiskas deployed in the post above is a B-29. Just sayin'. From nuquular attack to peace, love, and understanding in 10 posts and a few of those really shouldn't count.
You have absolutely no ability to think in the abstract? There are more colors than black and white. Do we need a 'facetious' smiley to help you out? http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/facetious
A lot of times I mock shit like Amerika's "right by might" strong arm international tactics. Or, throw in the word "prefer" while knowing that a thing has zero chance of ever happening. Or ask shit like: "are you a cop? "..... after a recent thread about cop hiring.
You forgot the B-32, and the B-36, which were US strategic bombers previous to the B-47. I remember a Jimmy Stewart movie about SAC, where they flew a B-36, which was a weird beast with 6 pusher turboprop engines. The B-58 Hustler doesn't seem to get any love either...
There were some really innovative aircraft from those times. Lockheed was in to some really different shit.
Yeah I forgot the B-36. The B-32 was never really used much. The B-58 didn't get any love because it didn't give any. It was a money hole and even worse, it was a deathtrap. Some ungodly high percentage of them crashed, like 1/4th of all built ended up in pieces. It was one of the coolest looking airplanes ever, though. IIRC, Lockheed didn't make any of those three.
You implied it. To which Lockheed aircraft of that era were you referring? Boeing and Convair were all over it at that time. Convair also had the high speed delta-wing interceptor F-102 Delta Dagger. The airport dude where the Cessna I fly lives used to fly those in Europe before he flew F-4's in Vietnam.
Lockheed was busy doing spy-stuff at the time, such as the U-2, I think, as well as the C-130, C-141, and the F-104 Starfighter. I think it was the spy stuff to which Whiskas was referring. The U-2 and the SR-71.
