| |
| Join The Cult | Tweakers | Image Gallery | Donate | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | |
Welcome to Tweak3DThis is an open forum about tech stuff, games, and cars. Sign-up here to join the discussion. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | ram command rate | permalink #1 |
| I grew up here | hello :0 so, my ram is running at 2T, and from what i gather its better to run at 1T. But, how much better? Is this a quality that depends on the specific stick of ram?(eg, can only some sticks make 1t, or is it pretty easy/common?). Should i just turn it on and see if my computer asplode? | |
| | | |
| | #2 |
| | |
| | |
| | permalink #2 | |
| Mines bigger | Sorry for the pointless post to sound like an idot......but what the hell is 2T and 1T when it comes to RAM? :s | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() There are 10 types of people in the world: Those who understand binary, and those who don't. " Use the best: Linux for servers, Mac for graphics, Windows for Solitaire." | ||
| | | |
| | permalink #3 | |
| I grew up here | command rate timing in real words, i have no idea | |
| | | |
| | permalink #4 | ||
| Tweak Minion | Could you be speaking of fsb-ram ratio? jamsan mentioned that to me in the thread "smoke??" and sped things up a bit. I've edited the quote to what I'm referring. Quote:
| ||
| Q6600@ 3.4 Underwater, P5E-VM HDMI, 4GB OCZ, EVGA 8800GT, PCP&C 610w | |||
| | | ||
| | permalink #5 | |||
| I grew up here | Quote:
| |||
| | | |||
| | permalink #6 | |
| Tweak Minion | O.k. This is it- http://www.lostcircuits.com/memory/ddr2/4.shtml in your other post you said you were overclocked, If this is the same pc this article suggests you may need the 2T timing. quote- " If the memory bus frequency is increased, often, the command bus latency needs to be increased as well. Therefore, at 133 MHz operation, the command latency often is set to 2T. That is, the command is latched only on the second cycle. Keep in mind that this latency only affects the initial access of a memory chip and all subsequent accesses are queued without additional delay. This means that for subsequent memory accesses, the CMD Rate is irrelevant, however for every access of a different page or chip, the initial command latency will come into play again. " It also mentions needing the delay if you have multiple sticks of ram. It's a good read, check it out. | |
| | | |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |