Tweak3D.Net
Save?
Not Registered Yet? Go here.
Xoxide Computer Mods Contact the webmaster to purchase this spot on the web site
Join The Cult Tweakers Image Gallery Donate Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to Tweak3D

This is an open forum about tech stuff, games, and cars. Register to access all forums, and to hide this ad and others.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-15-2008, 03:06 PM   permanent link to #1
 
Undertaker989's Avatar
Undertaker989
Tweak Minion
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,607 (#61 )
Thanked 1x in one post
Send a message via AIM to Undertaker989

Ok, sorry I'm getting OCD, but seeing as this is a tech subforum on a tweaker site, it should be one of the few places to ask this:

If I have 2 raid controller cards, running 2 raid arrays, lets say A and B, A containing the C partition and B containing the D partition, would I take a performance hit due to the fact that both array A and B reside on PCI Controller cards that are sharing the PCI bus?

Would it be faster to just use 1 array controller card for programs and video editing temp storage, and plug the other HDD running the main OS into the main IDE controller of the mobo?

To add to my worries, I want to add a SATA2 controller card to the pci bus as well to control my DVD burner and another SATA HDD.

I guess it all depends on whether or not the PCI bus will be a bottleneck on data writes/reads on the devices attached to PCI cards.

Undertaker989 is offline Ignore this User   Reply With Quote
Yesterday, 05:30 PM   #2
 
 


Google is online (hide)  
Old 07-15-2008, 04:49 PM   permanent link to #2
 
MSP's Avatar
MSP
Globe Trekker
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 17,854 (#1 )
Thanked 10x in 10 posts

Probably a bottleneck. The PCI bus maxes out at 133 megabytes/second.

MSP is offline Ignore this User   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2008, 05:32 PM   permanent link to #3
 
Undertaker989's Avatar
Undertaker989
Tweak Minion
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,607 (#61 )
Thanked 1x in one post
Send a message via AIM to Undertaker989

Thanks for the mb/sec unit.

Undertaker989 is offline Ignore this User   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2008, 08:29 PM   permanent link to #4
 
Undertaker989's Avatar
Undertaker989
Tweak Minion
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,607 (#61 )
Thanked 1x in one post
Send a message via AIM to Undertaker989

after quick reading/research, it seems pointless to run raid0, in the name of performance, over a PCI bus. I would be better off using single drives on the onboard controllers for 1.5GB/sec IDE bandwidth and just save my money at this point.

Undertaker989 is offline Ignore this User   Reply With Quote
Reply

Login to reply. Sign-up here.



1 people are viewing this thread! (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAID0 question Undertaker989 Tech 7 07-14-2008 01:34 PM
Questions about backing up Blu-ray, and Blu-ray in general smirnoff Tech 3 05-09-2008 11:48 PM
IIS/General web question SoulAssassin Tech 2 05-02-2007 03:03 PM
dual raid0 array. that's right. gbates31 Tech 1 03-14-2006 01:51 AM
Opinions on GBA & game (general question) Bear Gaming 8 12-17-2005 12:26 PM


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
©Tweak3D.Net 1998-2008Ad Management by RedTyger