[Ranger]

It's time to tell the truth about Mr. Ali. First, the misinformation: Mr. Ali suggests that we can change the truth if we don't like it the way it is. Where the heck did he come up with that? That's the question that perplexes me the most, because I have frequently criticized his unspoken plan to lower this country's moral tone and depreciate its commercial integrity. He usually addresses my criticisms by accusing me of ethnocentrism, boosterism, child molestation, and halitosis. Mr. Ali hopes that by delegitimizing me this way, no one will listen to me when I say that I have a dream, a mission, a set path that I would like to travel down. Specifically, my goal is to maintain social tranquillity. Of course, I don't know which are worse, right-wing tyrants or left-wing tyrants. But I do know that Mr. Ali is extraordinarily brazen. We've all known that for a long time. However, his willingness to utilize legal, above-ground organizing in combination with illegal, underground tactics to create widespread hysteria sets a new world record for brazenness. Once it becomes clear that in debates with Mr. Ali, it is important to evaluate whether his provocations reflect a sincere desire to present an alternative point of view or whether his agenda is primarily to replace discourse and open dialogue with cannibalism-prone positions and blatant ugliness, it becomes apparent that he coins polysyllabic neologisms to make his policies sound like they're actually important. In fact, his treatises are filled to the brim with words that have yet to appear in any accepted dictionary. Any meaningful analysis of the situation must allow for the fact that one could truthfully say that my opinions are the obverse of his. But saying that would miss the real point, which is that if he had done his homework, he'd know that it has been said that he thinks that he can make me react, on cue, to the trigger-words that he has inserted into my mind by dint of endless repetition if he can feed us ever-larger doses of his lies and crackpot assumptions. I, in turn, maintain that he wants nothing less than to increase society's cycle of hostility and violence. His habitués then wonder, "What's wrong with that?" Well, there's not much to be done with froward pop psychologists who can't figure out what's wrong with that, but the rest of us can plainly see that our national media is controlled by rummy vagabonds. That's why you probably haven't heard that Mr. Ali's occasional demonstrations of benevolence are not genuine. Nor are his promises. In fact, every time Mr. Ali tries, he gets increasingly successful in his attempts to blow the whole situation way out of proportion. This dangerous trend means not only death for free thought, but for imagination as well.

Mr. Ali wants us to feel sorry for the ghastly, lousy nitwits who promote promiscuity and obscene language. I feel we should instead feel sorry for their victims, all of whom know full well that Mr. Ali is always prating about how he should enable pesky freaks of nature to punch above their weight because "it's the right thing to do". (He used to say that the kids on the playground are happy to surrender to the school bully, but the evidence is too contrary, so he's given up on that score.) If I had my druthers, he would never have had the opportunity to let virulent fast-buck artists serve as our overlords. As it stands, I sometimes ask myself whether the struggle to express my views is worth all of the potential consequences. And I consistently answer by saying that sometime in the future Mr. Ali will create a Frankenstein's monster. Fortunately, that hasn't happened...yet. But it will unmistakably happen if we don't expose the connections between the dotty, disrespectful problems that face us and the key issues of Lysenkoism and paternalism. Mr. Ali's mercenaries have already started to beat plowshares into swords. The result: absolute vapidity, capricious and postmodernist cacophony, lack of personality, monotony, and boredom. This may sound like caricature, but Mr. Ali's new definition of "anarchoindividualist" is in disagreement with his pouty proposed social programs. Nevertheless, I can state with absolute certainty that Mr. Ali claims to be fighting for equality. What he's really fighting for, however, is equality in degradation, by which I mean that Mr. Ali's argument that we should abandon the institutionalized and revered concept of democracy is hopelessly flawed and totally circuitous. I can't help but wonder: Why does everyone hate Mr. Ali? Is it because of his business practices, exclusivity, disloyalty, disrespect, or because Mr. Ali keeps trying to rifle, pillage, plunder, and loot? The answer is quite simple. I already listed several possibilities, but because Mr. Ali lacks the ability to remember beyond the last two seconds of his life, I will restate what I said before, for his sake: If natural selection indeed works by removing the weakest and most genetically unfit members of a species, then he is clearly going to be the first to go.

Mr. Ali's stances may have been conceived in idealism, but they quickly degenerated into power-hungry exclusionism. I will dedicate the rest of my life to my efforts to take steps toward creating an inclusive society free of attitudinal barriers. Okay, that's a bit of an overstatement, but for all of you reading this who are not fickle bludgers, you can understand where the motivation for that statement comes from. Mr. Ali should not manufacture and compile daunting lists of imaginary transgressions committed against him. Not now, not ever.

On rare occasions, in order to preserve their liberties, sometimes people must relabel millions of people as "jealous". Mr. Ali does that even when his liberties aren't being threatened. Be always mindful that you may be worried that he will destroy the lives of good, honest people in a matter of days. If so, then I share your misgivings. But let's not worry about that now. Instead, let's discuss my observation that if history follows its course, it should be evident that Mr. Ali may encourage and exacerbate passivity in some people who might otherwise be active and responsible citizens right after he reads this letter. Let him. Eventually, I, not being one of the many treasonous dole-sucking parasites of this world, will fight the good fight. But there I go again, claiming that Mr. Ali is typical of ill-bred ragamuffins in his wild invocations to the irrational, the magic, and the fantastic to dramatize his metanarratives. Looking at it on the bright side, I have a plan to focus on concrete facts, on hard news, on analyzing and interpreting what's happening in the world. I call this plan "Operation answer the uninformed twits who reward mediocrity". (Granted, I need a shorter, catchier name, but that one will do for now.) My plan's underlying motif is that Mr. Ali likes to quote all of the saccharine, sticky moralisms about "human rights" and the evils of expansionism. But as soon as we stop paying attention, he invariably instructs his forces to turn me, a typically mild-mannered person, into a short-sighted vat of teetotalism. Then, when someone notices, the pattern repeats from the beginning. Though this game may seem perverse beyond belief to any sane individual, it makes perfect sense in light of Mr. Ali's headlong sound bites.

Today, we might have let Mr. Ali palliate and excuse the atrocities of his comrades. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will punish those who lie or connive at half-truths. We should note, of course, that what I've written about him doesn't prove anything in itself. It's only suggestive, but it does make a good point that if you think that a richly evocative description of a problem automatically implies the correct solution to that problem, then think again. The bottom line is that anyone who takes Mr. Ali's gloomy invectives seriously has obviously not spent much time around puerile misfits.



http://www.pakin.org/complaint/
if its a repost, i missed it

[Mr. Ali]

sorry you feel that way about me

[ThatHideousStrength]

???????????????????

[Bear]

-1

[msgwtco]

nice post. that is a really neat page. i had it generate one on tweak3d lol.

Tweak3d has always favored providing a privileged and protected status for lame-brained brigands, but that's not the point of this letter. The point is that it is undeniable by anyone but childish mattoids that a complete description of the problems with Tweak3d's vaporings would occupy several volumes. As this letter will make clear, if Tweak3d truly wanted to be helpful, it wouldn't vandalize our neighborhoods. Certain facts are clear. For instance, many of our present-day sufferings are the consequence of the vitriolic relationship between Tweak3d and the most intolerant fence-sitters you'll ever see. Let me rephrase that: Tweak3d wants to poke and pry into every facet of our lives. Why it wants that, I don't know, but that's what it wants. It is pointless to fret about the damage already caused by Tweak3d's effrontive credos. The past cannot be changed. We must cope with the present if we hope to affect our future and oppose evil wherever it rears its avaricious head. By framing the question in this way, we see that I've known some exhibitionists who were impressively lackadaisical. However, Tweak3d is randy, and that trumps lackadaisical every time.

Tweak3d's methods are much subtler now than ever before. Tweak3d is more adept at hidden mind control and its techniques of social brainwash are much more appealingly streamlined and homogenized. Stick your nose into anything Tweak3d has written recently, and you'll get a good whiff of narrow-minded adversarialism.

Tweak3d tries to make us think the way it wants us to think, not by showing us evidence and reasoning with us, but by understanding how to push our emotional buttons. Tweak3d doesn't care about freedom, as it can neither sell it nor put it in the bank. It's just a word to it. Tweak3d is currently limited to shrieking and spitting when it's confronted with inconvenient facts. In a matter of days, however, Tweak3d is likely to switch to some sort of "incite pogroms, purges, and other mayhem" approach to draw our attention away from such facts. If I may be so bold, I must ask that Tweak3d's lieutenants condemn -- without hesitation, without remorse -- all those who create a new fundamentalism based not on religion but on an orthodoxy of misoneism. I know they'll never do that, so here's an alternate proposal: They should, at the very least, back off and quit trying to leave us in the lurch. I mean, really. Have you ever had a bad dream about Tweak3d trying to manipulate the public like a puppet dangling from strings? Well, I have news for you. That wasn't a dream; it was real. That's our situation today, in very rough outline. Of course, I've left out a thousand details and refinements and qualifications. I've not mentioned that Tweak3d is starved for attention. And I've ignored faddism altogether. I've simply pointed out one key fact: Of particular interest to me is the way that it continuously denies that it is offended by anything that might suggest that there are lawsuits in its future.

[Da Lucky 1]

thats cool

[MSP]

That's funny. For a minute I was reading thinking "Ali is a perv-o and all that, but I don't recall him ever being that provacative..." Which I guess is why you used his name. Here's one for Brother Assassin:

Although I have no criticism of Bro. SoulAssassin's witticisms, I have a few observations and comments to share. I would like to start by discussing SoulAssassin's threats, mainly because they scare me. The thing I'm the most frightened about is that implying that rambunctious backbiters aren't ever laughable is no different from implying that SoulAssassin is the most recent incarnation of the Buddha. Both statements are ludicrous. He says that he answers to no one. That's a stupid thing to say. It's like saying that his flimflams can give us deeper insights into the nature of reality. I believe that it can be safely said that SoulAssassin uses vulgar language and makes obscene gestures at those whose opinions differ from his. Although I respect his right to free speech just as I respect it for stubborn shysters, uncompanionable blockheads, and hypocritical gauleiters, in SoulAssassin's yes-men, we can recognize the symptoms of decay of a slowly rotting world. If that fact hurts, get over it; it's called reality. And for another dose of reality, consider that if you intend to challenge someone's assertions, you need to present a counterargument. SoulAssassin provides none. In the end, what Bro. SoulAssassin is doing falls just short of giving handguns to schoolchildren.

[Hubcap]

i had trouble reading through the first paragraph.

[Ranger]

Originally Posted by Mr. Ali

sorry you feel that way about me

its a joke, your still cool

you were the first name to pop into my head when posting this

[superman]

hehe this is fun

[Brofar]

kthxbye

[Goofus Maximus]

Bleh. I've made five tries over a two days, and I STILL can't get myself through that first paragraph without some serious "WTF is he trying to say" overload! :P

I think I'll just skip this post, after this reply...