Tweak3D.Net
Save?
Not Registered Yet? Go here.
Join The Cult Tweakers Image Gallery Donate Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to Tweak3D

This is an open forum about tech stuff, games, and cars. Sign-up here to join the discussion.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-26-2008, 07:20 PM Bio fuels   permalink #1
OcTaNe91's Avatar
OcTaNe91
Gas pumper
 
Sep 2007
Last Seen: Yesterday
Location: nowhere kansas
Posts: 644 (#108OcTaNe91 was ranked #116 last month)
Thanked 2x in one post

reaper2292's 

Gamercard

when i was at the indy 500 they drove a corvette than ran on e85 fuel, the IRL runs all their cars on 95% ethanol and (i think) 5% racing fuel (so people dont drink the ethanol) and that it reduces green house gases and that it is a renewable resource. this got me thinking, if we are still burning a fuel to provide power isnt it still giving off green house gasses? is bio fuel nothing more than propaganda for the stupid drivers in the world who think their doing something for the environment? is this just postponing the inevitable?

Quote:
Originally Posted by USMC
I walk through the valley of darkness and fear no evil for I am the biggest baddest motherfucker in the valley.
OcTaNe91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Yesterday, 05:30 PM   #2
 
 


Google is online (hide)  
Old 05-26-2008, 10:31 PM   permalink #2
Jishory's Avatar
Jishory
Tweak Minion
 
Jan 2005
Last Seen: Yesterday
Location: Palmdale, CA
Posts: 2,236 (#39Jishory was ranked #41 last month)
Thanked 1x in one post

i have heard that it takes more fossil fuels to create a certain amount of ethanol then the ethanol replaces, the carbon that is in the ethanol the plant took out of the atmosphere as it was growing so it isnt adding any extra greenhouse gases and such to the atmosphere like fossil fuels does. i think the reason they run ethanol in race cars is because of its very high octane.

Jishory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2008, 10:40 PM   permalink #3
ninefivezero's Avatar
ninefivezero
infinite resolution
 
Jan 2005
Last Seen: Yesterday
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,108 (#6)
Thanked 4x in 3 posts

The entire ethanol industry in our country is corrupt, it is not a good example of the possibilities of bio-fuels.

Getting ethanol from corn is amazingly inefficient, but politicians from corn producing states got the legislation passed that states we must produce a certain amount of it. The truth is you can get more ethanol with less energy input out of all sorts of prairie grasses, algae, and so on.



"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - Franklin D. Roosevelt
ninefivezero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 08:00 AM   permalink #4
JustinL
Tweak Minion
 
Jan 2005
Last Seen: Yesterday
Posts: 1,451 (#63JustinL was ranked #64 last month)
Thanked 3x in 2 posts

I think we only get 1.2 units of energy from ethanol for each unit of energy we put in. Sugar cane ethanol is far better at something like 8:1, but it does not really grow well in a lot of places in this country.

Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch , Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote . Benjamin Franklin
JustinL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 08:31 AM   permalink #5
HEAVY-D's Avatar
HEAVY-D
Yo Yo Fight tha Powa
 
Jan 2005
Last Seen: Yesterday
Location: Dallas/Fort Worth
Posts: 1,435 (#64HEAVY-D was ranked #65 last month)
Thanked 0x in 0 posts

Ethanol seemed like a good thing at the time but the backlash has been catastrophic in terms of rising food prices. ATM ethanol = scam.

"Go beyond the impossible and kick reason to the curb! That's the Gurren-dan way!"
Kamina
HEAVY-D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 08:33 AM   permalink #6
sims's Avatar
sims
Jolly Roger
 
Jan 2005
Last Seen: Yesterday
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,761 (#53)
Thanked 0x in 0 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninefivezero View Post
The entire ethanol industry in our country is corrupt, it is not a good example of the possibilities of bio-fuels.

Getting ethanol from corn is amazingly inefficient, but politicians from corn producing states got the legislation passed that states we must produce a certain amount of it. The truth is you can get more ethanol with less energy input out of all sorts of prairie grasses, algae, and so on.
QFT unfortunely.

Well car enthusiast like myself like E85 due to having better anti knock properties(100+ octane rating) its by no means the environmental and anti-oil dependency cure its trying to be make out to be.

The biggest issue I see is that it doesn’t ultimately solve any problem’s. if E85 replaced oil we would no longer be so oil dependent as a nation, but we would then become dependent on corn and the farming industry. As it stands the prices of foods are hitting all time highs and there are food shortages around the world, doesn’t seem like a great idea to me.

There are examples of good biofuel’s though, such as biodiesel for an example.
sims is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 08:59 AM   permalink #7
OcTaNe91's Avatar
OcTaNe91
Gas pumper
 
Sep 2007
Last Seen: Yesterday
Location: nowhere kansas
Posts: 644 (#108OcTaNe91 was ranked #116 last month)
Thanked 2x in one post

reaper2292's 

Gamercard

Quote:
Originally Posted by sims View Post
There are examples of good biofuel’s though, such as biodiesel for an example.
but bio diesel is made from cooking oil, so it is still a food product no? it seems to me that any form of fuel (other than solar/wind/moving water) would cause some harm to the environment or economy. if we switch to hydrogen cars we will have more water in the atmosphere causing more precipitation causing flooding and so on. if we use soybean, sugar cane, corn, or any other form of ethanol we are over stretching an already limited crop supply, if we continue to use fossil fuels we put Co2 in the atmosphere causing more green house gases.

everyone says hybrids are the solution. for short term fuel costs yes, for long term environmental costs we are nailing our own coffin

am i mis understanding?
OcTaNe91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 09:59 AM   permalink #8
JustinL
Tweak Minion
 
Jan 2005
Last Seen: Yesterday
Posts: 1,451 (#63JustinL was ranked #64 last month)
Thanked 3x in 2 posts

with hydrogen cells, you get the hydrogen from the air, so there would be no real change in the atmosphere.


I agree with you about hybrids. I would like to see how much energy it takes to produce a hybrid and run it for 10 years compared to how much energy to produce a normal car and drive it for 10 years. I imagine there would not be a huge difference, but I don't know.


In my opinion, the REAL solution is to not become dependent on ONE energy source. I believe diesel engines are the answer, they will run on almost anything. You can run them on dino diesel, bio diesel, kerosene, jet fuel, jack daniels, pretty much any hydrocarbon. Currently, we are dependent on oil. A few Arabs decide they want a new mansion built so they raise the price of oil, what do we have an alternative to turn to? Now, if we get 1/5 of our fuel from corn crops, 1/5 from soybean. 1/5 from sugar cane, and 2/5 from oil, when the price of oil goes up, people will purchase more corn/soy/sugar fuels, which would create a surplus of dino fuel and drive the cost down. I just used cars as an example, but it applies to all energy consumption. We need to have a large diversity from an energy standpoint. I believe this includes nuke-u-lar, solar, wind, hydro, and as many others as we can.


BTW, I saw something the other day that said when 5% of a nuclear fuel rod has been consumed, the rod is no longer useful. There is some research on recovering the other 95% of usable material, but obviously not enough.
JustinL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 10:31 AM   permalink #9
sims's Avatar
sims
Jolly Roger
 
Jan 2005
Last Seen: Yesterday
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,761 (#53)
Thanked 0x in 0 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by OcTaNe91 View Post
but bio diesel is made from cooking oil, so it is still a food product no? it seems to me that any form of fuel (other than solar/wind/moving water) would cause some harm to the environment or economy. if we switch to hydrogen cars we will have more water in the atmosphere causing more precipitation causing flooding and so on. if we use soybean, sugar cane, corn, or any other form of ethanol we are over stretching an already limited crop supply, if we continue to use fossil fuels we put Co2 in the atmosphere causing more green house gases.

everyone says hybrids are the solution. for short term fuel costs yes, for long term environmental costs we are nailing our own coffin

am i mis understanding?
No, your on the right track, there is no perfect easy readily available simple solution ready for mass consumption yet. Everything we are doing right now are simply attempts to lesses the impacts and costs well a proper solution is worked out.


JustinL, I agree completely. Diesel might not be the ultimately long term answer, but it sure opens up alot of very good options not offered with gas engines. in the next couple years i'm hoping to have my diesel running on SVO/WVO.
sims is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 10:44 AM   permalink #10
ninefivezero's Avatar
ninefivezero
infinite resolution
 
Jan 2005
Last Seen: Yesterday
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 6,108 (#6)
Thanked 4x in 3 posts

I think the answer in the short term is plug-in hybrids.

They will be able to run around 200 miles on just the electric engine, no fuel needed. That alone would reduce most peoples oil usage by around 95%; since most trips are under 20 miles they would never need to burn fuel at all.

And even if your electricity is by burning coal (which sucks) its still more efficient than individual gas engines in every car from my understanding of it. If we can work up to more wind, solar, hydro, geothermal, wave and all the others, that would mean running your car with almost no carbon producing fuel at all.

And damn it sims, post in my new car thread
ninefivezero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2008, 11:12 AM   permalink #11
MSP's Avatar
MSP
Globe Trekker
 
Jan 2005
Last Seen: Yesterday
Posts: 16,464 (#1)
Thanked 7x in 7 posts

Quote:
Originally Posted by ninefivezero View Post
I think the answer in the short term is plug-in hybrids.

They will be able to run around 200 miles on just the electric engine, no fuel needed. That alone would reduce most peoples oil usage by around 95%; since most trips are under 20 miles they would never need to burn fuel at all.

And even if your electricity is by burning coal (which sucks) its still more efficient than individual gas engines in every car from my understanding of it. If we can work up to more wind, solar, hydro, geothermal, wave and all the others, that would mean running your car with almost no carbon producing fuel at all.
QFT. I think the Chevy Volt is the proto-type of what cars will look like for the foreseeable future. With an electric car people will be able to produce their own fuel, via everything from solar panels to hydro-electric to wind mills.

I won't be buying a 1st generation Volt, and I'm actually hoping that Honda or Toyota will have a similar offering before I'm ready to buy. But in the mean time I'll be putting an over-sized solar array (and possibly a wind mill too) on my roof so that when I am ready to buy I will be completely energy independent.

MSP is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Login to reply. Sign-up here.



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.0.0
©Tweak3D.Net 1998-2008Ad Management by RedTyger